AMD FirePro M6100 vs AMD Radeon HD 8790M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M6100 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 850 MHz
• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
• Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2123 vs 1306
• 10.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 4806
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 vs 12.759
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.731 vs 465.631
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 vs 1.576
• Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 vs 28.839
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 vs 80.418
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 vs 2181
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2517 vs 2014
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 vs 2181
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2517 vs 2014

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M

• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 303
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 vs 1803
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 vs 1803

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2123 1306
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	303 751
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	52486 4806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.059 12.759
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	750.731 465.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.395 1.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.283 28.839
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.915 80.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4537 2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1803 2656
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2517 2014
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4537 2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1803 2656
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2517 2014

Compare specifications (specs)