AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M6100 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 79% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 601 MHz
• Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 48.08 GTexel / s
• Around 43% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
• Around 96% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 2800 MHz
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2221 vs 1947
• 9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 5827
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 vs 10.054
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.731 vs 544.601
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 vs 1.46
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 vs 22.103
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 vs 36.553
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 vs 3855
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 vs 3855

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 960 vs 768
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 vs 1803
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 2517
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 vs 1803
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 2517

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 1947
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 300
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	52486 5827
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.059 10.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	750.731 544.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.395 1.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.283 22.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.915 36.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4537 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1803 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2517 4470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4537 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1803 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2517 4470

Compare specifications (specs)