AMD FirePro S4000X vs AMD Radeon R5 M230
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S4000X and AMD Radeon R5 M230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S4000X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 31 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- Around 81% better floating-point performance: 992.0 gflops vs 547.2 gflops
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.089 vs 8.593
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 478.725 vs 143.386
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.08 vs 0.852
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.934 vs 15.789
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 92.567 vs 49.196
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 vs 7 January 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops vs 547.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.089 vs 8.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 vs 143.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.08 vs 0.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.934 vs 15.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 vs 49.196 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M230
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 855 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S4000X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M230
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S4000X | AMD Radeon R5 M230 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.089 | 8.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 | 143.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.08 | 0.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.934 | 15.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 | 49.196 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 414 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 985 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2401 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 985 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S4000X | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Venus | Jet |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 | 7 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1438 | 1440 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | 855 MHz |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 825 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s | 17.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 16 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |