AMD FirePro S4000X vs NVIDIA NVS 510
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S4000X and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S4000X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 31 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 992.0 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.089 vs 6.809
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 478.725 vs 111.269
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.08 vs 0.399
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.934 vs 7.769
- 9.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 92.567 vs 9.522
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 vs 23 October 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops vs 306.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.089 vs 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 vs 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.08 vs 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.934 vs 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 vs 9.522 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S4000X
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S4000X | NVIDIA NVS 510 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.089 | 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 | 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.08 | 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.934 | 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 | 9.522 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 689 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1211 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 976 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 976 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S4000X | NVIDIA NVS 510 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Venus | GK107 |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 | 23 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1431 | 1432 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 797 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |