AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs AMD FirePro S4000X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and AMD FirePro S4000X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 7 August 2014 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S4000X
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 775 MHz vs 758 MHz
- Around 88% higher texture fill rate: 31 GTexel / s vs 16.46 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 88% better floating-point performance: 992.0 gflops vs 526.8 gflops
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.089 vs 15.145
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 478.725 vs 206.354
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.08 vs 1.2
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.934 vs 24.15
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 92.567 vs 85.46
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz vs 758 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s vs 16.46 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops vs 526.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.089 vs 15.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 vs 206.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.08 vs 1.2 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.934 vs 24.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 vs 85.46 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S4000X
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD FirePro S4000X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 19.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 478.725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 2.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 34.934 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 92.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD FirePro S4000X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Wani | Venus |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 7 August 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1433 | 1435 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | 775 MHz |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 526.8 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 16.46 GTexel / s | 31 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,410 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz |