AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4100 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 630 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 20.16 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 96
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 645.1 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 69 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1529 vs 738
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 481 vs 242
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2014 vs 2 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 630 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.16 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 645.1 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 69 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1529 vs 738 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 481 vs 242 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11231 vs 5519
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3974 vs 1620
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3974 vs 1620
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11231 vs 5519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3974 vs 1620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3974 vs 1620 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W4100 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1529 | 738 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 481 | 242 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5519 | 11231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.65 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 538.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.63 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.533 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.309 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1620 | 3974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1620 | 3974 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W4100 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde | GT215 |
Launch date | 13 August 2014 | 2 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 954 | 957 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 630 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 645.1 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 20.16 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 69 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Low Profile / Half Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 171 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 27.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Powerplay |