AMD FirePro W5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 776 MHz
• Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 39.6 GTexel / s vs 37.2 GTexel / s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 768 vs 288
• Around 42% better floating-point performance: 1,267 gflops vs 894.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2974 vs 2006
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 568 vs 443
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1914
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1914

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

• 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 102 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 3828 MHz vs 3200 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2974 2006
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	568 443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 1914
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 1914

Compare specifications (specs)