AMD FirePro W5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 533.3x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 570 vs 533
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3686
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3686
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 August 2012 vs 10 May 2012 |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 vs 533 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3686 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 39.6 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 768
- Around 94% better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,267 gflops
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5332 vs 2988
- Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15502 vs 9969
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 971.208 vs 771.327
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.281 vs 2.758
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 vs 4308
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 vs 4308
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 825 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,267 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5332 vs 2988 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15502 vs 9969 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 vs 771.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 vs 2.758 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 vs 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 vs 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2988 | 5332 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 | 533 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9969 | 15502 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 771.327 | 971.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.758 | 4.281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4308 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4308 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3361 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.208 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Pitcairn | GK104 |
| Launch date | 7 August 2012 | 10 May 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $399 |
| Place in performance rating | 566 | 564 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Price now | $474.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,267 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 39.6 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Form factor | Full Height / Half Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 183 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro W5000 with others
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
ATIFireMV 2250
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
NVIDIAP104-100
