AMD FirePro W5170M vs AMD FirePro M6100
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5170M and AMD FirePro M6100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5170M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 353 vs 291
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3189 vs 1803
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3189 vs 1803
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2517
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2517
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 August 2014 vs 16 October 2013 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 vs 291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3189 vs 1803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3189 vs 1803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 2517 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 2517 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 39% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,184 gflops
- Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2338 vs 1814
- 6.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 8322
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 vs 3409
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 vs 3409
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops vs 1,184 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2338 vs 1814 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 vs 8322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 vs 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 vs 3409 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5170M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W5170M | AMD FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 | 2338 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 | 291 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8322 | 52486 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3409 | 4537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3409 | 4537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3189 | 1803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3189 | 1803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 2517 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 2517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W5170M | AMD FirePro M6100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Tropo | Saturn |
| Launch date | 25 August 2014 | 16 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 680 | 844 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 1,651 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 51.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 88 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro W5170M with others
AMDFirePro W5170M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1000
AMDFirePro W5170M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX
AMDFirePro W5170M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8950 OEM
AMDFirePro W5170M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
AMDFirePro W5170M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M600M
AMDFirePro W5170M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
