AMD FirePro W5170M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5170M and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5170M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 784 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3311
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3311
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 August 2014 vs 22 July 2014 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz vs 784 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3311 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 87.81 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 1344 vs 640
- Around 78% better floating-point performance: 2,107 gflops vs 1,184 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4325 vs 1792
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 501 vs 356
- Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12321 vs 8303
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 vs 3409
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 vs 3409
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 vs 3189
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 vs 3189
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 87.81 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,107 gflops vs 1,184 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4325 vs 1792 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 501 vs 356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12321 vs 8303 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 vs 3189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 vs 3189 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5170M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W5170M | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1792 | 4325 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 356 | 501 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8303 | 12321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3409 | 6373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3409 | 6373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3189 | 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3189 | 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.194 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W5170M | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tropo | GK104 |
Launch date | 25 August 2014 | 22 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 696 | 697 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $854.99 | |
Price now | $446.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | 784 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 771 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 2,107 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 87.81 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro |