NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs AMD FirePro W5170M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M600M and AMD FirePro W5170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2151 vs 1788
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 3189
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 3189
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 25 August 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2151 vs 1788 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 vs 3189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 vs 3189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5170M
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 37% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 366 vs 349
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8045 vs 5983
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3409 vs 2945
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3409 vs 2945
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 366 vs 349 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8045 vs 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3409 vs 2945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3409 vs 2945 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M600M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5170M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M600M | AMD FirePro W5170M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2151 | 1788 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 366 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5983 | 8045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2945 | 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2945 | 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 | 3189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 | 3189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M600M | AMD FirePro W5170M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Tropo |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 25 August 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 681 | 682 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 37 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M600M with others
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
ATIFireGL V5100
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
IntelHD Graphics P4600
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
AMDFirePro D500
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
