AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce 820A
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W6150M and NVIDIA GeForce 820A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W6150M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 4.2x more texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 768 vs 96
- 5.5x better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2698 vs 1716
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2698 vs 1716
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1705
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1705
- 14.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43598 vs 2978
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 286 vs 158
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2358 vs 556
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 vs 17 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2698 vs 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2698 vs 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 1705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 1705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 vs 2978 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 vs 158 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2358 vs 556 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W6150M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 820A
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W6150M | NVIDIA GeForce 820A |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2698 | 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2698 | 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 1705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 1705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 | 2978 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | 158 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2358 | 556 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W6150M | NVIDIA GeForce 820A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Saturn | GF117 |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 | 17 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 658 | 1278 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |