AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R7 250X
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W6150M and AMD Radeon R7 250X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W6150M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 38 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,216 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1625 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2358 vs 2269
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 vs 13 February 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s vs 38 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops vs 1,216 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1625 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2358 vs 2269 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250X
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2698
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2698
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 286
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 2698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 2698 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 vs 286 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W6150M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250X
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W6150M | AMD Radeon R7 250X |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2698 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2698 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | 637 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2358 | 2269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.22 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.532 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.963 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.987 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.963 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3916 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3916 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W6150M | AMD Radeon R7 250X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Saturn | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 | 13 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 661 | 663 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Price now | $260.70 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.25 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,216 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 38 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,500 million |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 640 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 210 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 96 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1625 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |