AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R7 250X
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W6150M and AMD Radeon R7 250X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W6150M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 38 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,216 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1625 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2358 vs 2269
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 November 2015 vs 13 February 2014 |
| Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s vs 38 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops vs 1,216 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1625 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2358 vs 2269 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250X
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2698
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2698
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 286
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 2698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 2698 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 vs 286 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W6150M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W6150M | AMD Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2698 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2698 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | 637 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2358 | 2269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.187 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 637.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.917 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.987 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.805 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3916 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3916 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W6150M | AMD Radeon R7 250X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Saturn | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 12 November 2015 | 13 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 658 | 660 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Price now | $260.70 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.25 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,216 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 38 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,500 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 96 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro W6150M with others
AMDFirePro W6150M vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 280 PCI
AMDFirePro W6150M vs
ATIRadeon X600 XT
AMDFirePro W6150M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
AMDFirePro W6150M vs
AMDRadeon R7 250X
AMDFirePro W6150M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M280X
AMDFirePro W6150M vs
NVIDIAT600 Mobile
