AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W6150M and AMD Radeon R9 M280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W6150M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43598 vs 41708
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 286 vs 247
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2358 vs 814
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 vs 5 February 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 vs 41708 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 vs 247 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2358 vs 814 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M280X
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 56 GTexel / s vs 51.6 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 1,792 gflops vs 1,651 gflops
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 2698
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 2698
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s vs 51.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops vs 1,651 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 2698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 2698 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W6150M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M280X
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W6150M | AMD Radeon R9 M280X |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2698 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2698 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 | 41708 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | 247 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2358 | 814 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W6150M | AMD Radeon R9 M280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Saturn | Saturn |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 | 5 February 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 658 | 659 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 56 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | Not Listed | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 88 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |