AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W6150M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W6150M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 49.4 billion / sec
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,581.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43598 vs 15023
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 November 2015 vs 9 November 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s vs 49.4 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops vs 1,581.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 vs 15023 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2698
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2698
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 vs 286
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4605 vs 2358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1544 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2698 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 vs 286 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4605 vs 2358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W6150M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W6150M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2698 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2698 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 | 15023 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | 474 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2358 | 4605 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.378 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.363 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W6150M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Saturn | GF110 |
| Launch date | 12 November 2015 | 9 November 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 655 | 657 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Price now | $289.88 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.21 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | 1544 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 49.4 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 244 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin and One 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 192.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro W6150M with others
AMDFirePro W6150M vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 280 PCI
AMDFirePro W6150M vs
ATIRadeon X600 XT
AMDFirePro W6150M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3850
AMDFirePro W6150M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580
AMDFirePro W6150M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M280X
AMDFirePro W6150M vs
NVIDIAT500 Mobile
