AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W6150M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W6150M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 49.4 billion / sec
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,581.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43598 vs 15038
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 vs 9 November 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s vs 49.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops vs 1,581.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 vs 15038 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2698
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2698
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 286
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4616 vs 2358
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1544 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2698 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 vs 286 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4616 vs 2358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W6150M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W6150M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2698 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2698 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 | 15038 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | 478 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2358 | 4616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.378 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.363 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W6150M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Saturn | GF110 |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 | 9 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 658 | 660 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $289.88 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.21 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | 1544 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 49.4 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 244 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin and One 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 192.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |