AMD ROG Ally Extreme vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
Comparative analysis of AMD ROG Ally Extreme and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD ROG Ally Extreme
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 2700 MHz vs 1740 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 129.6 GTexel/s vs 125.3 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 90 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
Boost clock speed | 2700 MHz vs 1740 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 129.6 GTexel/s vs 125.3 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 90 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective
Launch date | 2022 vs 13 Jun 2023 |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 768 |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD ROG Ally Extreme
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
Name | AMD ROG Ally Extreme | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD ROG Ally Extreme | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Phoenix | GA107 |
Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 | 2022 |
Place in performance rating | 1568 | 88 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2700 MHz | 1740 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 55.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 129.6 GTexel/s | 125.3 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 90 Watt |
Transistor count | 25390 million | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 21 mm, 0.8 inches | |
Length | 280 mm, 11 inches | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.20 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | GDDR6 |