AMD Radeon 520 vs AMD Radeon R7 350
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 520 and AMD Radeon R7 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 804.7x more texture fill rate: 20.60 GTexel/s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26304 vs 7719
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 6 July 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s vs 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 vs 7719 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 660 GFLOPs
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2072 vs 1182
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2072 vs 1182
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 vs 1242
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 vs 1242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops vs 660 GFLOPs |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 vs 1182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 vs 1182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 vs 1242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 vs 1242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 520 | AMD Radeon R7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 862 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 202 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 | 7719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1182 | 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1182 | 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1242 | 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1242 | 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.507 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.719 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 520 | AMD Radeon R7 350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Oland | Cape Verde |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 1st Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 6 July 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1119 | 1121 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 660 GFLOPs | 819.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 4.10 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 4 | |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 20 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 520 with others
AMDRadeon 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Ultra
AMDRadeon 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 420 Go
AMDRadeon 520 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2000
AMDRadeon 520 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M420
AMDRadeon 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 350
AMDRadeon 520 vs
AMDRadeon 530
