AMD Radeon 530 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 274.3x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 89.6 GTexel / s
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 31 January 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- 4.7x more pipelines: 1792 vs 384
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 800 GFLOPs
- 16.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 vs 5014
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 vs 2021
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 2246
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 vs 2021
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 2246
- 3.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1914 vs 506
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops vs 800 GFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 vs 5014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 vs 2021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 2246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 vs 2021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 2246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 vs 506 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 530 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1030 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5014 | 82144 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2246 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2246 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 | 1914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 530 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Meso | Tahiti |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 31 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1099 | 503 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | 28 |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs | 2,867 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 320/384 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 20/24 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 240 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3/GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
ZeroCore |