AMD Radeon 530 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530 and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon 530

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 667 MHz
767.6x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 32.02 GTexel / s
Around 4% better floating-point performance: 800 GFLOPs vs 768.4 gflops
Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3008 MHz
Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5014 vs 4566

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 April 2017 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1024 MHz vs 667 MHz
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s vs 32.02 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	800 GFLOPs vs 768.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 55 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz vs 3008 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	5014 vs 4566

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1363 vs 1030
Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 174
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 vs 2021
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 vs 2246
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 vs 2021
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 vs 2246

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	576 vs 384
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1363 vs 1030
PassMark - G2D Mark	287 vs 174
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2294 vs 2021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3605 vs 2246
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2294 vs 2021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3605 vs 2246
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1030

1363

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

174

287

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5014

4566

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2021

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2246

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2021

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2246

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3362

Name	AMD Radeon 530	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1030	1363
PassMark - G2D Mark	174	287
Geekbench - OpenCL	5014	4566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2021	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2246	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2021	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2246	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	3362
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	506	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		40.703

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 530	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN	Kepler
Code name	Meso	GK106
Design	Radeon 500 Series
GCN generation	3rd Gen
Launch date	18 April 2017	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	1099	1101
Type	Desktop, Laptop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$84.95
Price now		$159.99
Value for money (0-100)		10.91
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz
Compute units	6
Core clock speed	1024 MHz	667 MHz
Floating-point performance	800 GFLOPs	768.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	576
Pixel fill rate	8.20 GP/s
Render output units	8
Stream Processors	320/384
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s	32.02 GTexel / s
Texture Units	20/24
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count		2,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model		5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	48 GB/s	48.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	3008 MHz
Memory type	DDR3/GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
DualGraphics
Enduro
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
PowerTune
TressFX
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus