AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and ATI Radeon 9800 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 380 MHz
- 8092.1x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 3.04 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- 6.6x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 680 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 175
- 16.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1077 vs 66
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 October 2003 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 380 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s vs 3.04 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 680 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 vs 175 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 vs 66 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | ATI Radeon 9800 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 175 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 | 66 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6124 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | ATI Radeon 9800 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Topaz | R360 |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 986 | 984 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 380 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | 3.04 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 24 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 47 Watt |
Transistor count | 834 M | 117 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 21.76 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 680 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |