AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 6770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 1413.8x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1077 vs 964
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 4 January 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops vs 696.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 vs 964 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770M
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 193
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8338 vs 6124
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3044 vs 2405
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3044 vs 2405
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 193 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8338 vs 6124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3044 vs 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3044 vs 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770M
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 6770M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 572 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 | 964 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6124 | 8338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 | 3044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 | 3044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.817 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 234.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.393 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.475 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 33.71 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 6770M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Topaz | Whistler |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 4 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 986 | 988 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 834 M | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 535 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon 9800 PRO
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9500M G
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 545v
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6770M
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M
