AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 6770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 1413.8x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1078 vs 964
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 4 January 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops vs 696.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1078 vs 964 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770M
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 193
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8338 vs 6085
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3044 vs 2405
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3044 vs 2405
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 193 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8338 vs 6085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3044 vs 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3044 vs 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770M
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 6770M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 572 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1078 | 964 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6085 | 8338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 | 3044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 | 3044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.817 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 234.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.393 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.475 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 33.71 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 6770M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Topaz | Whistler |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 4 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 986 | 988 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 834 M | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 535 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon 9800 PRO
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 545v
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6770M
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
IntelArc A350M
