AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 784.4x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 31.36 GTexel / s
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6124 vs 4933
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 25 June 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s vs 31.36 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops vs 752.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6124 vs 4933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3344 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 326 vs 193
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1688 vs 1077
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2343
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2343
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 2405
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 2405
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 vs 193 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1688 vs 1077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 vs 2343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 vs 2343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 vs 2405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 vs 2405 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 326 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 | 1688 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6124 | 4933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 | 3093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 | 3093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 | 3504 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 | 3504 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.025 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Topaz | GK107 |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 25 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 986 | 987 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | 31.36 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 24 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 834 M | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |