AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • 784.4x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 31.36 GTexel / s
  • Around 4% better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6085 vs 4944
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 April 2017 vs 25 June 2013
Texture fill rate 24.60 GTexel/s vs 31.36 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 784.1 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 6085 vs 4944
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 3344

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

  • Around 34% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 730 MHz
  • Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 4500 MHz
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 324 vs 193
  • Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1691 vs 1078
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2343
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2343
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 2405
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 2405
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 980 MHz vs 730 MHz
Memory clock speed 5400 MHz vs 4500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 324 vs 193
PassMark - G3D Mark 1691 vs 1078
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3093 vs 2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3093 vs 2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3504 vs 2405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3504 vs 2405

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
193
324
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1078
1691
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6085
4944
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2343
3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2343
3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2405
3504
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2405
3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3344
Name AMD Radeon 535 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
PassMark - G2D Mark 193 324
PassMark - G3D Mark 1078 1691
Geekbench - OpenCL 6085 4944
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2343 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2343 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2405 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2405 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 3344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 455.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 28.025
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2148

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 535 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Kepler
Code name Topaz GK107
Design Radeon 500 Series
Launch date 18 April 2017 25 June 2013
Place in performance rating 986 987
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 980 MHz
Floating-point performance 784.1 gflops 752.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 384
Pixel fill rate 8.20 GP/s
Render output units 8
Stream Processors 384
Texture fill rate 24.60 GTexel/s 31.36 GTexel / s
Texture Units 24
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 834 M 1,270 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 12 API
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 48 GB/s 86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz 5400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus