AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 83% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 400 MHz
7687.5x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
30.6x better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
3.8x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
12.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1076 vs 87
3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1027
3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1027

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 April 2017 vs 9 May 2007
Core clock speed	730 MHz vs 400 MHz
Texture fill rate	24.60 GTexel/s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 16
Floating-point performance	784.1 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 80 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1076 vs 87
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346 vs 1027
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346 vs 1027

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

2.9x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 50 Watt
Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 308 vs 192

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	17 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	308 vs 192

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

192

308

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1076

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

1027

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

1027

Name	AMD Radeon 535 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
PassMark - G2D Mark	192	308
PassMark - G3D Mark	1076	87
Geekbench - OpenCL	6137
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2405
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346	1027
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346	1027

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 535 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Tesla
Code name	Topaz	G86
Design	Radeon 500 Series
Launch date	18 April 2017	9 May 2007
Place in performance rating	986	984
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz
Compute units	6
Core clock speed	730 MHz	400 MHz
Floating-point performance	784.1 gflops	25.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	80 nm
Pipelines	384	16
Pixel fill rate	8.20 GP/s
Render output units	8
Stream Processors	384
Texture fill rate	24.60 GTexel/s	3.2 GTexel / s
Texture Units	24
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	17 Watt
Transistor count	834 M	210 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	48 GB/s	9.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	1200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
PowerMizer 7.0