AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 27% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • 2673.9x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
  • 12x more pipelines: 384 vs 32
  • 10.7x better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 73.6 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
  • 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1400 MHz
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 84
  • 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1071 vs 208
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1857
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1857
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 April 2017 vs 9 June 2007
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate 24.60 GTexel/s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 32
Floating-point performance 784.1 gflops vs 73.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 80 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 193 vs 84
PassMark - G3D Mark 1071 vs 208
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 1857

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
193
84
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1071
208
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
1857
Name AMD Radeon 535 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
PassMark - G2D Mark 193 84
PassMark - G3D Mark 1071 208
Geekbench - OpenCL 6339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2405
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 1857

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 535 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Tesla
Code name Topaz G84
Design Radeon 500 Series
Launch date 18 April 2017 9 June 2007
Place in performance rating 992 1477
Type Desktop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 784.1 gflops 73.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 80 nm
Pipelines 384 32
Pixel fill rate 8.20 GP/s
Render output units 8
Stream Processors 384
Texture fill rate 24.60 GTexel/s 9.2 GTexel / s
Texture Units 24
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 834 M 289 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 MXM-HE
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 48 GB/s 22.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz 1400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3, GDDR2
Shared memory no

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
Gigathread technology
HDCP-capable
PCI-E 16x
PowerMizer 7.0