AMD Radeon 540 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 540 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 540
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 248 vs 240
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35524 vs 9329
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 248 vs 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 vs 9329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 1001.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 6 Gbps
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 vs 1404
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2355
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2355
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 1726
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 1726
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 6 Gbps |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 vs 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 2355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 vs 1726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 vs 1726 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 540
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 540 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 248 | 240 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1404 | 2392 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 | 9329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2355 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2355 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1726 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1726 | 4027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 540 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | 4th Gen GCN | Pascal |
| Code name | Topaz | GP108B |
| Design | AMD Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 21 February 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 860 | 861 |
| Type | Notebook | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture Units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6 Gbps | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |

