AMD Radeon 540 vs AMD Radeon R9 M380
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 540 and AMD Radeon R9 M380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 540
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35524 vs 12565
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2355 vs 536
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2355 vs 536
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2855
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2855
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 vs 12565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2355 vs 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2355 vs 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 2855 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380
- 1280x better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 6 Gbps
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 248
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2773 vs 1404
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3688 vs 1726
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3688 vs 1726
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 6 Gbps |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 248 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2773 vs 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 vs 1726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 vs 1726 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 540
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M380
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 540 | AMD Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 248 | 509 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1404 | 2773 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 | 12565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2355 | 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2355 | 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1726 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1726 | 3688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 540 | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | 4th Gen GCN | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Topaz | Strato |
| Design | AMD Radeon 500 Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 860 | 863 |
| Type | Notebook | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,536 gflops |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture Units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
| Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Eyefinity | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6 Gbps | 1500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 540 with others
AMDRadeon 540 vs
ATIRadeon X1600 XT
AMDRadeon 540 vs
ATIFirePro V5800
AMDRadeon 540 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
AMDRadeon 540 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
AMDRadeon 540 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
AMDRadeon 540 vs
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
