AMD Radeon 540 versus NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 540 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 540
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1124 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 248 versus 240
- 3.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35524 versus 9329
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 248 versus 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 versus 9329 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- 1001.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 6 Gbps
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 versus 1404
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 2355
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 2355
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 versus 1726
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 versus 1726
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 18 April 2017 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 6 Gbps |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 versus 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 2355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 2355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 versus 1726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 versus 1726 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 540
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon 540 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 248 | 240 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1404 | 2392 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 | 9329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2355 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2355 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1726 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1726 | 4027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon 540 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | 4th Gen GCN | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Topaz | GP108B |
| Conception | AMD Radeon 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 21 February 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 860 | 861 |
| Genre | Notebook | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 8 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture Units | 32 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 48 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6 Gbps | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon 540 avec des autres
AMDRadeon 540 vs
ATIRadeon X1600 XT
AMDRadeon 540 vs
ATIFirePro V5800
AMDRadeon 540 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
AMDRadeon 540 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
AMDRadeon 540 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
AMDRadeon 540 vs
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
