AMD Radeon 610 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 719 MHz
- 1791.3x more texture fill rate: 20.60 GTexel/s vs 11.5 GTexel / s
- Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5369 vs 2975
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 May 2019 vs 6 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 719 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s vs 11.5 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5369 vs 2975 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1654 vs 1072
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1654 vs 1072
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2370 vs 1785
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2370 vs 1785
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2859
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2859
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1654 vs 1072 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1654 vs 1072 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2370 vs 1785 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2370 vs 1785 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2859 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 610 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1072 | 1654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1072 | 1654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1785 | 2370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1785 | 2370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2859 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2859 | 3358 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5369 | 2975 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 812 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.814 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.583 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.631 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Sea Islands | GK208 |
Launch date | 23 May 2019 | 6 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1318 | 1320 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 5 | |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 719 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 41.20 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 659.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.240 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | 11.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 690 million | 1,270 million |
Floating-point performance | 552.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 36 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |