AMD Radeon 610 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 719 MHz
  • 1791.3x more texture fill rate: 20.60 GTexel/s vs 11.5 GTexel / s
  • Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5369 vs 2975
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 May 2019 vs 6 March 2014
Core clock speed 1030 MHz vs 719 MHz
Texture fill rate 20.60 GTexel/s vs 11.5 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5369 vs 2975

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M

  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
  • Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
  • Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1654 vs 1072
  • Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1654 vs 1072
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2370 vs 1785
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2370 vs 1785
  • Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2859
  • Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2859
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 384 vs 320
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1654 vs 1072
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1654 vs 1072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2370 vs 1785
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2370 vs 1785
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 2859
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 2859

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1072
1654
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1072
1654
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1785
2370
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1785
2370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2859
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2859
3358
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5369
2975
Name AMD Radeon 610 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1072 1654
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1072 1654
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1785 2370
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1785 2370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2859 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2859 3358
Geekbench - OpenCL 5369 2975
PassMark - G3D Mark 812
PassMark - G2D Mark 174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.814
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 162.583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 30.631

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 610 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler 2.0
Code name Sea Islands GK208
Launch date 23 May 2019 6 March 2014
Place in performance rating 1318 1320
Type Laptop

Technical info

Compute units 5
Core clock speed 1030 MHz 719 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 41.20 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 659.2 GFLOPS
Pipelines 320 384
Pixel fill rate 8.240 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 20.60 GTexel/s 11.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 33 Watt
Transistor count 690 million 1,270 million
Floating-point performance 552.2 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None
Width IGP
Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 12 API
OpenCL 1.2 1.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 5.1
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 36 GB/s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3 / GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA