AMD Radeon 620 vs ATI Radeon 9200 SE

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and ATI Radeon 9200 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 16 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 3.7x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • 30.7x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 800 MTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
  • 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
  • 2.7x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) vs 332 MHz
  • Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 223 vs 129
  • 300.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 902 vs 3
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 1 March 2003
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 200 MHz
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s vs 800 MTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 150 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 64 MB
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) vs 332 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 223 vs 129
PassMark - G3D Mark 902 vs 3

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9200 SE

  • Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 28 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9200 SE

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
223
129
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
902
3
Name AMD Radeon 620 ATI Radeon 9200 SE
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1116
PassMark - G2D Mark 223 129
PassMark - G3D Mark 902 3

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 620 ATI Radeon 9200 SE

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Rage 7
Code name Polaris 24 RV280
Launch date 13 May 2019 1 March 2003
Place in performance rating 1129 1127
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 150 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384
Pixel fill rate 8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s 800 MTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 28 Watt
Transistor count 1550 million 36 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 AGP 8x
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12 8.1
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 1.4
Shader Model 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Memory bandwidth 14.40 GB/s 2.656 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 332 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR