AMD Radeon 620 vs Intel HD Graphics 630
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and Intel HD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 890.6x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1859
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1859
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 30 August 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1859 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 vs 694
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 1116
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 207
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1110 vs 917
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 vs 207 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1110 vs 917 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3344 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 207 | 268 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 917 | 1110 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4580 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 30 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1240 | 1242 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 189 million |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 620 with others
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 LE
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9100 IGP
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5700 Ultra
AMDRadeon 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
AMDRadeon 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 630
AMDRadeon 620 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
