AMD Radeon 620 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 853.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1870
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1870
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 1 September 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1870 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 694
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1116
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 300 vs 207
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1238 vs 917
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 300 vs 207 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1238 vs 917 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3309 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 207 | 300 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 917 | 1238 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4649 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 420 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 1 September 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 1240 | 1241 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 189 million |
| Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 620 with others
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 LE
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9100 IGP
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5700 Ultra
AMDRadeon 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
AMDRadeon 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 630
AMDRadeon 620 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
