AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 17 May 2017 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 vs 1991
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 vs 1991
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 694
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 1116
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 vs 205
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2473 vs 897
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 vs 1991 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 vs 1991 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 1116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 1116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 vs 205 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2473 vs 897 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3331 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 445 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 2473 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9706 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1083 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 24 | N17P-G1 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 17 May 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1248 | 862 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1670 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 1550 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |