AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 1020 MHz
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1085 MHz
  • 1122.7x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 350x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 5.0 GB/s
  • Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9651 vs 9257
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 18 February 2014
Core clock speed 1082 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Boost clock speed 1218 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Texture fill rate 38.98 GTexel/s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 5.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3720 vs 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3720 vs 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 vs 3346
Geekbench - OpenCL 9651 vs 9257

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 3467
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 3467
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 507 vs 217
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3349 vs 1435
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4498 vs 3467
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4498 vs 3467
PassMark - G2D Mark 507 vs 217
PassMark - G3D Mark 3349 vs 1435

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3467
4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3467
4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
3704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3346
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
9651
9257
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
217
507
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1435
3349
Name AMD Radeon 630 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3467 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3467 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3720 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3720 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 3346
Geekbench - OpenCL 9651 9257
PassMark - G2D Mark 217 507
PassMark - G3D Mark 1435 3349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 34.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 639.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.341
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 69.814
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1049

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 630 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Maxwell
Code name Polaris 23 GM107
Launch date 13 May 2019 18 February 2014
Place in performance rating 755 756
Launch price (MSRP) $119
Price now $150.99
Type Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 27.54

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1218 MHz 1085 MHz
Compute units 8
Core clock speed 1082 MHz 1020 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1247 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines 512 512
Pixel fill rate 19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 38.98 GTexel/s 34.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 55 Watt
Transistor count 2200 million 1,870 million
CUDA cores 512
Floating-point performance 1,111 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 95 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 5.7 inches (145 mm) 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width Dual-slot
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.0 GB/s 80 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) 5.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA