AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 88% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 1210.6x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 238 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3467 vs 3245
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3467 vs 3245
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 25 July 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 448 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 238 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 vs 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 vs 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9716 vs 8605
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 217
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3121 vs 1435
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9716 vs 8605 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 vs 217 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3121 vs 1435 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3351 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8605 | 9716 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 462 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1435 | 3121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 908.754 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.015 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.519 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 760 | 757 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 248 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 3000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon X600 SE
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
AMDRadeon 630 vs
AMDRadeon E8950
AMDRadeon 630 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
