AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 88% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 1210.6x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 238 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3467 vs 3245
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3467 vs 3245
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 25 July 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 448 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 238 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 vs 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 vs 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9716 vs 9651
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 221
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2840 vs 1269
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9716 vs 9651 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 vs 221 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2840 vs 1269 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3351 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 | 9716 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 471 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1269 | 2840 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 908.754 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.015 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.519 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 759 | 756 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 248 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 3000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
