AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 88% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 1210.6x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 238 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3467 vs 3245
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3467 vs 3245
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 448 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 vs 3245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 vs 3245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9716 vs 9651
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 217
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3121 vs 1435
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9716 vs 9651 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 vs 217 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3121 vs 1435 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | 3245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | 3245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 | 9716 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 462 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1435 | 3121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 908.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.015 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 23 | GF100 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 754 | 757 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 248 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |