AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 88% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • 1210.6x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 238 Watt
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3467 vs 3245
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3467 vs 3245
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed 1082 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate 38.98 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 512 vs 448
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 238 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3467 vs 3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3467 vs 3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3720 vs 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3720 vs 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070

  • 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
  • Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9716 vs 9651
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 217
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3121 vs 1435
Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 3000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 9716 vs 9651
PassMark - G2D Mark 462 vs 217
PassMark - G3D Mark 3121 vs 1435

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3467
3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3467
3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3351
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
9651
9716
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
217
462
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1435
3121
Name AMD Radeon 630 NVIDIA Tesla C2070
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3467 3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3467 3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3720 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3720 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 3351
Geekbench - OpenCL 9651 9716
PassMark - G2D Mark 217 462
PassMark - G3D Mark 1435 3121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 908.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.015
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 43.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 93.344

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 630 NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Fermi
Code name Polaris 23 GF100
Launch date 13 May 2019 25 July 2011
Place in performance rating 754 757
Type Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1218 MHz
Compute units 8
Core clock speed 1082 MHz 575 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1247 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines 512 448
Pixel fill rate 19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 38.98 GTexel/s 32.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 238 Watt
Transistor count 2200 million 3,100 million
Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 1x DVI
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 5.7 inches (145 mm) 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Width Dual-slot

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.0 GB/s 144.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) 3000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5