AMD Radeon 660M vs Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 660M and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Video outputs and ports, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 660M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1900 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 9120x more texture fill rate: 45.60 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 22 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13430 vs 3212
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 3 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 45.60 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 20 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13430 vs 3212 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 660M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 660M | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13430 | 3212 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 628 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 660M | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Rembrandt | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 3 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1356 | 1358 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 22 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1459 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 20 |
Pixel fill rate | 30.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 45.60 GTexel/s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 13100 million | 392 million |
Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |