AMD Radeon 660M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 660M and NVIDIA Tesla M2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Video outputs and ports, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 660M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 574 MHz
- 1416.1x more texture fill rate: 45.60 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 40 nm
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 45.60 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 448 vs 384
Pipelines | 448 vs 384 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 660M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
Name | AMD Radeon 660M | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13430 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 660M | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Rembrandt | GF100 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1356 | 1359 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,099 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 574 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1459 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Pixel fill rate | 30.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 45.60 GTexel/s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 13100 million | 3,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |