AMD Radeon 740M vs AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 740M and AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 740M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.3x more boost clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 811 vs 355
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3209 vs 1894
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 23 April 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 811 vs 355 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3209 vs 1894 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 740M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 740M | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 811 | 355 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3209 | 1894 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10125 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 740M | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Phoenix | Raven |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 23 April 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 236 | 931 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Compute units | 4 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | |
Pixel fill rate | 20.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 40.00 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 25390 million | 4,940 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | |
Memory bus width | System Shared | |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | |
Memory type | System Shared |