AMD Radeon E6465 vs NVIDIA Tesla M60

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E6465 and NVIDIA Tesla M60 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6465

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 0 month(s) later
  • Around 8% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 557 MHz
  • 12x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 300 Watt
Launch date 29 September 2015 vs 30 August 2015
Core clock speed 600 MHz vs 557 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 300 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60

  • 448.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s
  • 25.6x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 160
  • 50.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 192.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
  • Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 517 vs 354
  • 33.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7652 vs 231
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2x 2048 vs 160
Floating-point performance 2x 4,833 gflops vs 192.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2x 8 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 517 vs 354
PassMark - G3D Mark 7652 vs 231

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E6465
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M60

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
354
517
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
231
7652
Name AMD Radeon E6465 NVIDIA Tesla M60
PassMark - G2D Mark 354 517
PassMark - G3D Mark 231 7652
Geekbench - OpenCL 29272
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 114.389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1451.124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 70.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 314.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 886
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1791
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 886
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1791

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon E6465 NVIDIA Tesla M60

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Maxwell 2.0
Code name Caicos GM204
Launch date 29 September 2015 30 August 2015
Place in performance rating 474 475
Type Desktop Workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 600 MHz 557 MHz
Floating-point performance 192.0 gflops 2x 4,833 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 160 2x 2048
Texture fill rate 4.8 GTexel / s 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 300 Watt
Transistor count 370 million 5,200 million
Boost clock speed 1178 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2x 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s 2x 160.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5