Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs AMD Radeon E6465
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P750 and AMD Radeon E6465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 12000x more texture fill rate: 57.60 GTexel/s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 256 vs 160
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 449 vs 354
- 7.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1663 vs 231
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 29 September 2015 |
| Texture fill rate | 57.60 GTexel/s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 256 vs 160 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 449 vs 354 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1663 vs 231 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6465
- 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6465
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | AMD Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 449 | 354 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1663 | 231 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6538 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics P750 | AMD Radeon E6465 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Caicos |
| Launch date | 2021 | 29 September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 476 | 474 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 115.2 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 921.6 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 460.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 160 |
| Pixel fill rate | 28.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 57.60 GTexel/s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 192.0 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 370 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |

