AMD Radeon E6465 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E6465 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6465
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 4.8 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 231 vs 114
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 September 2015 vs 20 April 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 231 vs 114 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 360 vs 354
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 360 vs 354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E6465
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon E6465 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 | 360 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 231 | 114 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon E6465 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Curie |
| Code name | Caicos | G73 |
| Launch date | 29 September 2015 | 20 April 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 474 | 472 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
| Price now | $150.25 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.98 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 192.0 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | |
| Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 370 million | 177 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 198 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
