AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs AMD Radeon E6465
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and AMD Radeon E6465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 29.3x more texture fill rate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 12.8x more pipelines: 2048 vs 160
- 23.5x better floating-point performance: 4,506 gflops vs 192.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 29 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 140.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops vs 192.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6465
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 120 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6465
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon E6465 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34732 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon E6465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Caicos |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 29 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 471 | 474 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops | 192.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 140.8 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |