AMD Radeon E6760 vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E6760 and ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6760
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 120x more pipelines: 480 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 150 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 32 MB
- 7x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 460 MHz
- 292.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 877 vs 3
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 vs 145
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 May 2011 vs 1 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 480 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 32 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 460 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 877 vs 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 vs 145 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon 9200
- 55.6x more texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E6760
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E6760 | ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 877 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 | 145 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9761 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 293.065 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.002 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.148 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 820 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3528 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 820 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3528 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E6760 | ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Rage 7 |
Code name | Turks | M9+ |
Launch date | 2 May 2011 | 1 March 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $239.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1138 | 1141 |
Price now | $239.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 800 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Transistor count | 716 million | 36 million |
Boost clock speed | 250 MHz | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | AGP 8x |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.0 | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 14.72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 200 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 460 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 128 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs |