NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs AMD Radeon E6760

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and AMD Radeon E6760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 600 MHz
• Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 976 vs 877
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.122 vs 3.112
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 320.57 vs 293.065
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1453 vs 820
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3447 vs 1945
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1453 vs 820
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3447 vs 1945

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6760

• 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 62 Watt
• Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 2600 MHz
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 vs 328
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9761 vs 3925
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.002 vs 12.67
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 52.148 vs 31.168
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3528 vs 3353
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3528 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6760

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 877
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	328 485
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3925 9761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.122 3.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	320.57 293.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.67 13.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.168 52.148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1453 820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3447 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3528
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1453 820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3447 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3528

Compare specifications (specs)