NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon E6760
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and AMD Radeon E6760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 657 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 768 vs 480
- Around 75% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1720 vs 877
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.673 vs 3.112
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 vs 293.065
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.512 vs 0.445
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 vs 13.002
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.992 vs 52.148
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 vs 820
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2728 vs 1945
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 vs 820
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2728 vs 1945
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 2 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops vs 576.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1720 vs 877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.673 vs 3.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 vs 293.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 vs 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 vs 13.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 vs 52.148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 vs 820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2728 vs 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 vs 820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2728 vs 1945 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6760
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 vs 232
- Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9761 vs 5599
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3528 vs 3333
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3528 vs 3333
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 vs 232 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9761 vs 5599 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3528 vs 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3528 vs 3333 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6760
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | AMD Radeon E6760 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1720 | 877 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 485 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5599 | 9761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.673 | 3.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 | 293.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 | 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 | 13.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 | 52.148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 | 820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2728 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3528 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 | 820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2728 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3528 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | AMD Radeon E6760 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK106 | Turks |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 2 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1126 | 1129 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $239.99 | |
Price now | $239.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 657 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 600 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 GTexel / s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |