NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon E6760

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and AMD Radeon E6760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 657 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 768 vs 480
• Around 75% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1720 vs 877
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.673 vs 3.112
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 vs 293.065
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.512 vs 0.445
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 vs 13.002
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.992 vs 52.148
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 vs 820
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2728 vs 1945
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 vs 820
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2728 vs 1945

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6760

• Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 55 Watt
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 vs 232
• Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9761 vs 5605
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3528 vs 3333
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3528 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6760

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 877
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	232 485
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5605 9761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.673 3.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	509.958 293.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.512 0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.422 13.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.992 52.148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2836 820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2728 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3528
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2836 820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2728 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3528

Compare specifications (specs)