NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon E6760

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and AMD Radeon E6760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 10% higher core clock speed: 657 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 2.9x more texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 768 vs 480
  • Around 75% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1720 vs 877
  • 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.673 vs 3.112
  • Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 vs 293.065
  • 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.512 vs 0.445
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 vs 13.002
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.992 vs 52.148
  • 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 vs 820
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2728 vs 1945
  • 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 vs 820
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2728 vs 1945
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 May 2013 vs 2 May 2011
Core clock speed 657 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate 42.05 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 480
Floating-point performance 1,009 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1720 vs 877
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.673 vs 3.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 509.958 vs 293.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.512 vs 0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.422 vs 13.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 53.992 vs 52.148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2836 vs 820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2728 vs 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2836 vs 820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2728 vs 1945

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6760

  • Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 55 Watt
  • Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 vs 232
  • Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9761 vs 5599
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3528 vs 3333
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3528 vs 3333
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 55 Watt
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 485 vs 232
Geekbench - OpenCL 9761 vs 5599
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3528 vs 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3528 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6760

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1720
877
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
232
485
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5599
9761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.673
3.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
509.958
293.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.512
0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
30.422
13.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
53.992
52.148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2836
820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2728
1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
3528
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2836
820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2728
1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
3528
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M AMD Radeon E6760
PassMark - G3D Mark 1720 877
PassMark - G2D Mark 232 485
Geekbench - OpenCL 5599 9761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.673 3.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 509.958 293.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.512 0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.422 13.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 53.992 52.148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2836 820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2728 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333 3528
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2836 820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2728 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333 3528
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M AMD Radeon E6760

Essentials

Architecture Kepler TeraScale 2
Code name GK106 Turks
Launch date 30 May 2013 2 May 2011
Place in performance rating 1126 1129
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $239.99
Price now $239.99
Value for money (0-100) 5.07

Technical info

Boost clock speed 657 MHz
Core clock speed 657 MHz 600 MHz
CUDA cores 768
Floating-point performance 1,009 gflops 576.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 768 480
Texture fill rate 42.05 GTexel / s 14.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 2,540 million 716 million

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size large
SLI options 1

API support

DirectX 12 API 11.0
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 64.0 GB / s 51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 3200 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA