AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD Radeon R5 M430
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9171 MCM and AMD Radeon R5 M430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 89% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
- Around 89% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.321 vs 13.812
- 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 924.953 vs 144.604
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.499 vs 0.981
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.632 vs 18.55
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.705 vs 65.872
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 October 2017 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops vs 659.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.321 vs 13.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 924.953 vs 144.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.499 vs 0.981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.632 vs 18.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.705 vs 65.872 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M430
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | AMD Radeon R5 M430 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.321 | 13.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 924.953 | 144.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.499 | 0.981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.632 | 18.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.705 | 65.872 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 649 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5084 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1157 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2212 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1157 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2212 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Exo |
Launch date | 3 October 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1181 | 1182 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 855 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 20.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 |