AMD Radeon HD 6290 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6290 and NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6290
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 475 MHz
- 2.5x more pipelines: 80 vs 32
- Around 71% better floating-point performance: 104 gflops vs 60.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 20 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 32 vs 29
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 105 vs 90
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 December 2011 vs 31 December 2007 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Pipelines | 80 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops vs 60.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 32 vs 29 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 105 vs 90 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
- Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 7.6 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1267 vs 1185
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1267 vs 1185
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1267 vs 1185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1267 vs 1185 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6290
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6290 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 32 | 29 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 105 | 90 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 220 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 595 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 595 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1185 | 1267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1185 | 1267 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6290 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Cedar | G84 |
Launch date | 4 December 2011 | 31 December 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1644 | 1646 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 475 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 60.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 7.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3, GDDR2 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |