AMD Radeon HD 6320 vs NVIDIA GeForce G102M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6320 and NVIDIA GeForce G102M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6320
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1474 vs 890
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1474 vs 890
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 16 November 2010 vs 8 January 2009 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1474 vs 890 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1474 vs 890 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G102M
- 2x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 43
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 168 vs 147
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 vs 43 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 168 vs 147 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6320
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G102M
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6320 | NVIDIA GeForce G102M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 43 | 59 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 147 | 168 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 323 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 684 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 684 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1474 | 890 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1474 | 890 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6320 | NVIDIA GeForce G102M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Zacate | MCP79MX |
| Launch date | 16 November 2010 | 8 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $554.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1615 | 1617 |
| Price now | $554.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 600 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 80 | |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Gigaflops | 48 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 210 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR2 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | VGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 1.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
