AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP and NVIDIA Quadro 1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3253 vs 2133

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 November 2011 vs 13 January 2011
Pipelines	160 vs 96
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	3253 vs 2133

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

Around 58% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 443 MHz
3.2x more texture fill rate: 11.2 GTexel / s vs 3.54 GTexel / s
Around 90% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 141.76 gflops
Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 570 vs 254
Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 147
Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1633 vs 873
Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1633 vs 873
Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2327 vs 1434
Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2327 vs 1434

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	700 MHz vs 443 MHz
Texture fill rate	11.2 GTexel / s vs 3.54 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	268.8 gflops vs 141.76 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	570 vs 254
PassMark - G2D Mark	193 vs 147
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1633 vs 873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1633 vs 873
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2327 vs 1434
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2327 vs 1434

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

254

570

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

147

193

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3253

2133

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

873

1633

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

873

1633

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1434

2327

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1434

2327

Name	AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP	NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	254	570
PassMark - G2D Mark	147	193
Geekbench - OpenCL	3253	2133
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	873	1633
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	873	1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1434	2327
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1434	2327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		5.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		207.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.52
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		10.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		23.677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		894
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		894

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP	NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Essentials
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Fermi
Code name	WinterPark	GF108
Launch date	1 November 2011	13 January 2011
Place in performance rating	1442	1443
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$174.95
Price now		$99.95
Value for money (0-100)		8.91
Technical info
Core clock speed	443 MHz	700 MHz
Floating-point performance	141.76 gflops	268.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	160	96
Texture fill rate	3.54 GTexel / s	11.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	1,180 million	585 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
Memory
Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Shared memory		0