AMD Radeon HD 6430M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6430M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6430M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 160 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 106 vs 81
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 January 2011 vs 14 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 160 vs 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 106 vs 81 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 480 MHz
- 9.2x more texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 3.84 GTexel / s
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 352.0 gflops vs 153.6 gflops
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 452 vs 193
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 480 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s vs 3.84 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops vs 153.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 452 vs 193 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6430M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6430M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 193 | 452 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 106 | 81 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6430M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Seymour | G92 |
Launch date | 4 January 2011 | 14 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1307 | 1316 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $925 | |
Price now | $925 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.12 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 480 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 153.6 gflops | 352.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 3.84 GTexel / s | 35.2 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 370 million | 754 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |