AMD Radeon HD 6540G2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6540G2 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6540G2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 15x more pipelines: 480 vs 32
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
| Launch date | 14 June 2011 vs 8 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 32 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2744 vs 1597
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2744 vs 1597
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2744 vs 1597 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2744 vs 1597 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6540G2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6540G2 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 802 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 802 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1597 | 2744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1597 | 2744 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 145 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 29 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6540G2 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Tesla |
| Launch date | 14 June 2011 | 8 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1524 | 1527 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Code name | G96 | |
Technical info |
||
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 32 | |
| Floating-point performance | 96 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 144 | |
| Texture fill rate | 9.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 314 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 (DDR2) / 25 (GDDR3) | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 500 (DDR2) / 800 (GDDR3) MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Single Link DVIDisplayPortVGAHDMIDual Link DVI | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |